decision sent to author nature reject
[CDATA[// > This letter usually contains information on how to return your revised manuscript including instructions on how to highlight the changes made and when you need to return the revised version. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. The decision is sent to the author. Help us to improve this site, send feedback. To obtain For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. 10. We welcome people and content from all related fields. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it's a Nature journal, that's unlikely. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Authors Holly Kantin, David Wendler. On occasion, particularly if the editors feel that additional technical expertise is needed to make a decision, they may obtain advice from additional reviewers. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript, HANDBOOK: A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal. On the basis of the external reviews and their own reading, the editor makes a decision on the manuscript (accept, revise, reject but encourage resubmission, reject). All Rights Reserved. This decision is the sole responsibility of the journal editor. In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. GSA Bulletin: gsab@geosociety.org This is in addition to describing the changes in your point by point cover letter. Cookie Notice The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. If the editors or reviewers have highlighted shortcomings with your paper that you think you can address please indicate how you would do this, such as providing further data. More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . Like other journals in the Nature family, Nature Plants has no external editorial board involved in editorial decision-making. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. //--> For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. This decision typically indicates that the editor saw potential value in the topic or idea for your article but does not believe that it has been fully developed yet, either conceptually or in writing. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. [CDATA[// >
Weald Of Kent Grammar School Ofsted,
Reproduction Gone With The Wind Lamps,
546237352fd6aaab How Long Can A Veteran Stay On Hud Vash,
Articles D